Comments for Richard Carrier Blogs https://www.richardcarrier.info/ Announcing appearances, publications, and analysis of questions historical, philosophical, and political by author, philosopher, and historian Richard Carrier. Tue, 01 Apr 2025 19:09:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 Comment on My New Book! Jesus: Militant or Nonexistent? Two Views Compared by Mathew F https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33635#comment-40322 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 19:09:40 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33635#comment-40322 I’ve been keen to hear more from you.

Tbh I prefer your works on things that don’t specifically revolve around the historicity of Jesus as I think your philosophical positions are much more enlightening.

Either way, I will be purchasing this book in support of your ongoing work.

]]>
Comment on A Thorough Fisk of the Arguments of Fernando Bermejo-Rubio and Franco Tommasi by Charlie Brady https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/26700#comment-40321 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 13:40:17 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=26700#comment-40321 A very thorough fisk indeed! Thanks.

]]>
Comment on The Weird Fruit Mystery (Correcting a Sentence in My Survey of Roman Science) by Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33617#comment-40316 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:23:55 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33617#comment-40316 In reply to William Arthurs.

Correct. The theorists propose architectural examples exist, but per the linked discussions here, they are confusing pineapples with pinecones.

]]>
Comment on The Weird Fruit Mystery (Correcting a Sentence in My Survey of Roman Science) by Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33617#comment-40315 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:22:45 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33617#comment-40315 In reply to Kevin Odermatt.

Good catch. Fixed.

]]>
Comment on The Weird Fruit Mystery (Correcting a Sentence in My Survey of Roman Science) by Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33617#comment-40314 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:22:24 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33617#comment-40314 In reply to Frans.

They are now (pineapple, and mango, production has spread to nearly every continent now). But not then.

]]>
Comment on The Weird Fruit Mystery (Correcting a Sentence in My Survey of Roman Science) by Frans https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33617#comment-40313 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:11:05 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33617#comment-40313 In reply to ncmncm.

PS These are even smaller, but just to give an idea of possible variety in size.
https://northcoastjacarandas.com.au/products/dwarf-pineapple-ananas-comosus-nanus

]]>
Comment on The Weird Fruit Mystery (Correcting a Sentence in My Survey of Roman Science) by Frans https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33617#comment-40312 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:06:30 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33617#comment-40312 In reply to ncmncm.

Some pineapples are small. Like most domesticated food plants, the wild source had much smaller fruits.

Not only that, but you can readily buy mini-pineapples like in the mosaic — here in Europe anyway. They taste even sweeter and you can eat the core without removing it. I believe they’re more seasonal than large pineapples, presumably meaning they aren’t imported from all over the planet.

]]>
Comment on The Weird Fruit Mystery (Correcting a Sentence in My Survey of Roman Science) by Kevin Odermatt https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33617#comment-40311 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 03:04:50 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33617#comment-40311 Thanks for the interesting article!

I think there may be a typo in the sentence, “Cotton was mostly imported but some studies indicate cultivation was beginning in North Africa, which was led arid then.” Should it be, “…which was less arid then.”?

]]>
Comment on The Weird Fruit Mystery (Correcting a Sentence in My Survey of Roman Science) by William Arthurs https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33617#comment-40310 Sun, 30 Mar 2025 23:31:18 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33617#comment-40310 In “Wren’s London” (1988), Colin Amery suggests that the decorative architectural properties of the pineapple were so obvious that only a few years elapsed from its being brought to the British Isles for the first time, and its application as a decorative element in the neo-classical architecture of the 17th c.

Amongst all the decorations of ancient architecture — acanthus and palm leaves on capitals, “egg and dart”, etc — as far as I know, the pineapple never appears once. If they had known of it, this seems to me somewhat unlikely.

]]>
Comment on Hicks: Murderer by Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/6729#comment-40309 Sun, 30 Mar 2025 20:33:32 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=6729#comment-40309 In reply to storm.

The only relevant metric for this conversation is:

Are there countries that are (1) officially atheist and (2) murder lots of people and (3) do so because of their atheism (and not for some other reason).

So the question is: are those countries (only those, not others) rare both (1) now and (2) throughout history.

If the answer is “yes” then you agree with me. We’re done. You can go.

If the answee is “no” then you need to present evidence that those countries (only those, not others) are commonplace either (1) now or (2) throughout history.

Everything else is a waste of time. So stop spinning yarn. Respond to the only relevant question.

]]>