Eleven women I've made passes at before have come forward to affirm my behavior has always been polite and respectful of consent, rendering claims to the contrary suspect. Some of these women are of the same age and social status as Amy Frank and Lauren Lane (the only two making allegations who have named themselves), countering any notion that I behave differently with women of different age or status.

Of my six alleged accusers:

1. After I told O at a pub that I'd like to ask her out (literally almost those very words) and she reacted negatively, I immediately apologized and did not ask her again. She later informed me her negative reaction was surprise, not displeasure, and that she just wasn't interested. Defense has already admitted they have no knowledge otherwise (per Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 12-01-16, Exhibit 6, Declaration of Stephanie Zvan, Par. 17(c)). In other words, all I did was ask for consent, and respect her answer.

2. After I asked C, in entirely polite terms, if she wanted to start a sexual relationship and she said no, I said that was cool, and was totally fine with her answer. I never brought it up again. There is no evidence she has claimed otherwise. In other words, all I did was ask for consent, and respect her answer.

3. Whatever claims have been attributed as coming from M (the defendants won't tell me), they are either forged, false, or misrepresented and therefore cannot evince any misbehavior on my part. M is the woman with whom I had a sexual relationship at Skepticon in 2013 that displeased Lauren Lane after our breakup and my clumsy attempt to get back with her (per Complaint, Exhibit 25, Affidavit of Dr. Richard Carrier, Par. 22). I have a complete record of all my correspondence with M, and it clearly establishes a continuous amiable friendship with no nonconsensual elements whatever, for years, right up even until after I filed my lawsuit. Which correspondence will conclusively prove either that M has never accused me of anything, or that any accusations she has made while only pretending to be my friend, are false. I more suspect that whatever she said is not being honestly reported.

4. All I ever did with Dadabhoy is send a polite loveletter to a years-long friend, and then respect her answer. I asked for consent. I respected the answer.

5. Frank herself has not said anything about indicating displeasure at anything I did. Even her false account of what happened consists only of my attempting to persuade her to date me (albeit with weird sleazy whispered notions) and awaiting her reply. And all I actually did was tell her she could ask me out in future, if she wanted and was able (in almost those very words). She gave no negative indication. And I never revisited the matter. Just another ask for consent and respecting the reply.

6. Submitted email and eyewitness affidavits establish I only ever had a consensually flirtatious and eventually sexual relationship with Lane, an escalation of friendship spanning many years, and that in fact she initiated all of it (from the flirtation, to the ask, to the sex, to the relationship). I later broke up with her. And then I ineptly attempted to renew our previous relationship with a single badly worded letter that inappropriately jumped right back into the pragmatic sexual banter we had engaged in when together. But as soon as she responded, I immediately apologized (documented in Defense Documents, Bates No. 000547) and never engaged in any sexual banter or actions with her again.

Lane's own correspondence with me after that proves this (e.g. Defense Documents, Bates No. 000575, sent 18 November 2013; and Bates No. 584, sent 21 September 2015). As does all her correspondence mentioning me, in all her communications with anyone whatever (friends and colleagues), from nearly when first we met all the way up to even beyond the filing of my lawsuit, which she submitted under formal discovery (Defense Documents, Bates Nos. 000271-76, 000285-385, 000414-30, 000456, 000476, 000520-22, 000547, and 000557-607). There is not a single mention in any of her correspondence with anyone of any complaint regarding my behavior toward her involving physical contact or persisting with anything unwanted; just grievances regarding that one letter. So once again, its ineptitude aside, that's still just another asking for consent and respecting the reply.

That's all six. There are no other claims.