There is no evidence any of my six alleged accusers have even claimed I continued any behavior they said was unwanted (except Frank years later, through her lawyer, but evidence now proves that false).
P.Z. Myers is the only person to publicly claim I'd disregarded requests to stop any behavior. But he then admitted in court he had no evidence of that. In Carrier v. Myers, "Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss," 12 August 2019, Dkt. 30, pp. 5-6:
Defendant did not write that Plaintiff “persisted” in sexual behavior “in defiance of specific requests that he cease”, but rather that he had received reports of such. This is provably true. The June 15, 2016 Facebook, post by Amy Frank and the June 20, 2016, Skepticon blog post evidence such reports. ... [And] an article by Stephanie Zvan referred to two other people about whom Carrier “met their polite deferral of his interest with more blunt expressions of interest.”
Myers cites no other evidence. Yet none of those three sources he cites mention my persisting in any behavior after requests that I cease. Thus in defense of his motion in court, his lawyer concedes Myers' words were "at worst, inaccuracies of expression." But this matters. We must correctly describe what happened; because there is a galaxy of difference between someone asking you out after being told not to, and someone who hasn't been told that. The latter has to ask you to find that out.
And in my case the facts are these:
1. After I told O I'd like to ask her out and she reacted negatively, I immediately apologized and did not ask her again. She later informed me her negative reaction was surprise, not displeasure, and that she just wasn't interested. Defense has already admitted they have no knowledge otherwise (per Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 12-01-16, Exhibit 6, Declaration of Stephanie Zvan, Par. 17(c)).
2. After I asked C if she wanted to start a sexual relationship and she said no, I said that was cool, and was totally fine with her answer. I never brought it up again. There is no evidence she has claimed otherwise.
3. Whatever claims have been attributed as coming from M (the defendants won't tell me), they are either forged or false, and therefore cannot evince any misbehavior on my part. M is the woman with whom I had a sexual relationship at Skepticon 2013 that displeased Lauren Lane after our breakup and my clumsy attempt to get back with her. I have a complete record of all my correspondence with M, and it clearly establishes a continuous amiable friendship with no nonconsensual elements whatever, for years, right up even until after I filed my lawsuit. Which correspondence will conclusively prove either that M has never accused me of anything, or that any accusations she has made while only pretending to be my friend, are false.
4. Dadabhoy declared in their own emails to me that I never repeated or continued any behavior with them that they had ever indicated displeasure at. They specifically state that they did not want any of my behavior toward them to change, did not regard my one letter to them as wrong, and that I had never expressed sexual interest in them before (Complaint, Exhibit 25, Affidavit of Dr. Richard Carrier, Pars. 63-64, referencing Affidavit Exhibit 2, emails from Dadabhoy to Carrier, dated 11 September 2014 at 7:09:01 and 10:55:25, and 12 September 2014 at 12:54:31 and 1:53:52; relevant quotations in Dadabhoy). There is no evidence I ever did again. And of all their list of grievances against me (ibid., email of 11 September 2014 at 4:48:16), none consist of any behavior they had ever told me was unwanted, or indeed anything other than just what they didn't like about me or my letter. Subsequent email correspondence between us (which I can produce if required) demonstrates the same.
5. Frank did not mention in her original or subsequent complaints that I continued any behavior she stated any displeasure at, until most recently (Carrier v. Frank, "Answer and Counterclaim," Pars. 35, 41, 44, 46, 47). That's a demonstrable lie. She never stated any displeasure to me about anything, and her own subsequent Facebook messages to me prove this.
6. Submitted email and eyewitness affidavits establish I only ever had a consensually flirtatious and eventually sexual relationship with Lane. They contradict any possibility of it being otherwise. The only untoward action, my one inept letter to her attempting to renew our previous relationship, I never renewed. As soon as she responded to it, I immediately apologized (as documented: Defense Documents, Bates No. 000547), and never engaged in any sexual banter or actions with her again. Her own correspondence with me after that supports this (e.g. Defense Documents, Bates No. 000575, sent 18 November 2013; and Bates No. 584, sent 21 September 2015; likewise Bates No. 592 and even Bates No. 598). As does all her correspondence mentioning me, in all her communications with anyone whatever (friends and colleagues), from nearly when first we met all the way up to even beyond the filing of my lawsuit, which she submitted under formal discovery (Defense Documents, Bates Nos. 000271-76, 000285-385, 000414-30, 000456, 000476, 000520-22, 000547, and 000557-607). Not a single mention in any of her correspondence with anyone of any complaint of my behavior toward her involving physical contact or persisting with anything unwanted. Pretty much just grievances regarding that one letter.
That's all six. There are no other claims.