1. Of my six alleged accusers, there is to date no evidence at all that M, C, O, or Dadabhoy have even claimed I touched them inappropriately (and Dadabhoy's email correspondence with me confirms she had no such grievance to report). That leaves only Amy Frank and Lauren Lane.
2. Amy Frank has most recently claimed I touched a tattoo on her arm, and her leg when we were squeezed into the backseat of a car. Neither is sexual in nature. But also neither is true. I'm actually paranoid about touching tattoos without permission; her husband was sitting next to her in the car; and none of the witnesses present saw either happen. Her original complaint to the SSA also said nothing of touching. Only the following year did she vaguely insinuate that I touched her (per my Complaint, Pars. 46-51), then after witnesses disputed that, she reverted to her original version lacking that claim (Complaint, Pars. 70-73), then after she was sued she invented an even more elaborate claim of touching in a Countersuit (Carrier v. Frank, "Answer and Counterclaim," Pars. 23, 43, 44), none of which is corroborated by multiple witnesses present; and one witness has even confirmed to the court it didn't happen (Complaint, Par. 81(e), referencing Exhibit 24, Affidavit of Spencer Hawkins, Pars. 16-17).
3. Lauren Lane did not make any public claim of nonconsensual contact, but subsequently claimed, through counsel, that I touched her knee and hugged her without permission (see legal correspondence, page 2, under "'Sexual Harassment' Statements Are True," third paragraph). Neither could be claimed sexual. Nor is either plausible. But she has made no other claims of nonconsensual contact.
There is no evidence I ever touched Lane without her permission, not even so trivially as touching a knee or hugging. To the contrary, our email correspondence, and multiple witness affidavits, establish she was the one consensually pursuing me and initiating physical contact with me (as documented in my account regarding Lane). As both bodies of evidence show, after Lane persisted in flirting with me and asking me for a sexual relationship for years, both in person and by email, we had a consensual sexual relationship for half a year, beginning at Skepticon in 2012, which witnesses attest she initiated. After I ended our relationship, we never engaged in any physical contact again. Accordingly, she can adduce no witnesses to the contrary.
As I've noted (in Lane), Lane's close friend, whom I shall call Kay, was witness to all these events and the consensual nature of our relationship in all years prior to our breakup, and to the nature of our interactions in all years after our breakup, and will testify truthfully to these facts if subpoenaed. Accordingly, Lane's claim of nonconsensual contact cannot be sustained. All witnesses and evidence contradict it.